Splitting of the moon
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The splitting of the moon (Arabic: انشقاق القمر) is a claimed miracle done by the prophet Muhammad in Islamic tradition. The incident is mentioned in many early Muslim traditions as the context of revelation (asbāb an-nuzūl) for the Qur'anic verse 54:1-2 and virtually all Muslim commentators accept the historicity of the miracle. These early traditions are transmitted on the authority of companions of Muhammad such as Ibn Abbas, Anas bin Malik, Abdullah bin Masud and others. According to the Indian Muslim scholar Yusuf Ali, the moon might split again when the day of judgment approaches.
My own Deist opinion: Note: The following below is a perfect example of Religious intellectuals only partially using their Natural God given Reason commenting and arguing on Revealed (Faith Only) Miracles from the same book's third slant. Why as being the god able to converse with a person who has to convey his message instead of with his great god power telling everyone at once so there could be no misinterpretation thereof.. Or why did he not appear when the printing press was invented not that long ago so it would not have to be hand written on leather parchments. A tedious job taking years and finally interpreted from ancient languages when invented.Western historians such as A.J. Wensinck and Denis Gril, reject the historicity of the miracle arguing that the Qur'an itself denies miracles, in their traditional sense, in connection with Muhammad. Others historians such as Daniel Martin Varisco hold that something that "seemed like moon splitting in two parts" happened.
Now, Dear reader take a break viewing some wonderful creative Art Work before continuing.
- 1 The Qur'an and Islamic tradition
- 2 Western academic view
- 3 In later Islam
- 4 Debate over the inviolability of heavenly bodies
- 5 Literature
- 6 See also
- 7 References
The Qur'an and Islamic tradition
The hour drew nigh and the moon did rend asunder. And if they see a miracle they turn aside and say: Transient magic.
There are many early traditions and stories that explain the above verse as a miracle performed by Muhammad in order to convince Quraysh of his prophethood. Virtually all Muslim commentators accept the authenticity of those traditions. The following verse 54:2, "But if they see a Sign, they turn away, and say, 'This is (but) transient magic'" is taken in the support of this view. The classical commentator Ibn Kathir provides a list of the early traditions mentioning the incident: A tradition transmitted on the authority of Anas bin Malik states that Muhammad split the moon after the pagan Meccans asked for a miracle. (My own adlib: A David Copperfield could have been a greater Prophet with his abilities had he been born then and we would have been reading about even greater miracles today!).... Another tradition from Malik transmitted through other chains of narrations, mentions that the mount Hira was visible between the two parts of the moon (Mount Hira is located in Hijaz. Muslims believe that Muhammad received his first revelations from God in a cave on this mountain). A tradition narrated on the authority of Jubayr ibn Mut'im with a single chain of transmission says that the two parts of the moon stood on two mountains. This tradition further states that the Meccan responded by saying "Muhammad has taken us by his magic...If he was able to take us by magic, he will not be able to do so with all people." Traditions transmitted on the authority of Ibn Abbas briefly mention the incident and do not provide much details. Traditions transmitted on the authority of Abdullah bin Masud describe the incident as follows:
We were along with Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) at Mina, that moon was split up into two. One of its parts was behind the mountain and the other one was on this side of the mountain. Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said to us: Bear witness to this 039:6725
Al-Zamakhshari, a famous commentator of the Qur'an, acknowledged the splitting of the moon as one of Muhammad's miracles. But he also suggested that the splitting might take place only on the day of judgment. The Muslim scholar Yusuf Ali provides three different interpretations of the verse. He holds that perhaps all three are applicable to the verse: Moon once appeared cleft asunder at the time of Muhammad in order to convince the unbelievers. It will split again when the day of judgment approaches (here the prophetic past tense is taken to indicate the future). Yusuf Ali connects this incident with the disruption of the solar system mentioned in 75:8-9. Lastly, he says that the verses can be metaphorical, meaning that the matter has become clear as the moon.
Dissenting commentators who do not accept the miracle narration such as Hasan al-Basri (d. 110 H.) and 'Ata al-Khurasani (d. 135 H.) believe that the verse only refers to the splitting of the moon at the day of judgment. Likewise, M. A. S. Abdel Haleem writes:
The Arabic uses the past tense, as if that Day were already here, to help the reader/listener imagine how it will be. Some traditional commentators hold the view that this describes an actual event at the time of the Prophet, but it clearly refers to the end of the world. 
Some other Muslim thinkers had difficulties accepting this event and other preternatural events and, according to Annemarie Schimmel, sometimes tried to "de-mythologize" it. For example, Shah Waliullah of Delhi (d. 1762) said that the event "may have been a kind of hallucination, or perhaps caused by a smoke, by the swooping down of a star, a cloud, or an eclipse of the sun or the moon which might be given the impression that the moon was actually split in two."
It would be wise to reinforce your reasoning before it drowns in this huge humongous warping of Faith by taking a break and clicking below. After taking this break from our American Fathers You may find yourself and your mind wonderfully free of mental blockages as they were enabling them to form and sign our unique Constitution and their Love of God guaranteeing Freedom for all people of all religions and even those with none.
Western academic view
According to Denis Gril, Muhammad prophesied but was not granted to perform miracles in their traditional sense "as they were not, ipso facto, sufficient to convince unbelievers." According to A.J. Wensinck, the Qur'an itself denies miracles in connection with Muhammad and instead emphasizes on his "signs" (āyāt) which were later understood to mean the very verses of the Qur'an. Wensinck says that the miracles attributed to Muhammad could be found in the traditions and not in the Qur'an. According to Marshall Hodgson, later Muslims constructed the miracle based on the above Qur'anic verse. According to Daniel Martin Varisco however, something that seemed like moon splitting in two parts happened when the Meccans began to persecute the Muslims: the naming of chapter (sura) 54 as the Moon is a reference to this event.
In later Islam
The narrative was used by some later Muslims to convince others of the prophethood of Muhammad. Annemarie Schimmel for example quotes the following from Muslim scholar Qadi Iyad who lived in Ceuta in Spain:
My own observation based on my God Given Reason: When the Koran was written on parchment copied from Hebrew and mainly Roman also parts in Greek containing, one must realize, that it is from the early part of the Seventh Century Ad or more Scientifically expressed ce. (common Era). Nations did not exist the way they do today. They were all formed of many various tribes and groups of tribes, dialects cultures and those that had the same religious beliefs held many variations of the same. The Earth was the center of their known universe (Our Solar System) and flat encased in a dome. The stars were small as bright diamond jewels all contained in this dome above the Earth. According to the Word: God worried that the Tower of Babel was being built too high and destroyed it by confusing the people so they all spoke in strange tongues as bable and were unable to understand each other; unable to communicate with each other construction ceased before people would be able to climb up reaching His heavenly domain. The people of that time due to the little and false science of astrology that they believed All fact if you beleive it is the word of your God written in your Torah, Bible And Koran. Actual size and realistic distances of Heavenly bodies were not comprehended by their still evolutionarily mental capacities which were even less removed then our own animal desires of today. I put this in here so you will realize the folly arguments of the so called intelectuals below who are assuming by crediting a much greater Scientific knowledge encompassing the anceint mind when Science was not invented by Humankind untl a thousand plus years later. Not until Galeleo's time and the telescope did a challenge arise against the Christian teaching that God placed us in the center of his universe. And we Gentiles were the enlightened ones. Yes, dear Reader, Even the Roman Catholic Church still taught that the Earth was the center of the Universe. Having imprisonned a Jesuit Priest named Copernickus a few decades prior to Galileo. Only recently did Pope Benedict XVI admit that he was right and forgave him. To this Institution and all the Revealed Religion Institutions Knowledge is their greatest fear. They are determined to keep their power by keeping their subjects so confused with a twisted meaning of Faith and their invented words to explain impossible unprovable Mysteries such as substantransiation; the actual changing of unleavened bread and wine becoming the body and blood of Jesus. brought about by the magical mystery of God that only I repeat ONLY an ordained Catholic preist saying special incantations (words) may accomplish because transformation could only describe how the features and appearence of Jesus changed while the apostles watched him in a garden and he was joined by two prophets who came down from above glowing as him in a mysterious white light.. Now lets get back to more Intellectual liars:
It has not been said of any people on the earth that the moon was observed that night such that it could be stated that it was not split. Even if this had been reported from many different places, so that one would have to exclude the possibility that all agreed upon a lie, yet, we would not accept this as proof to the contrary, for the moon is not seen in the same way by different people.... An eclipse is visible in one country but not in the other one; in one place it is total, in the other one only partial.
Living in Spain, Qadi Iyad was not aware of the traditions of other side of the world in India, Schimmel states. It is told that Shakrawati Farmad (or Chakrawati Farmas), king of Malabar in southern India had watched this split at that very night. The king is said to have later converted to Islam upon learning what had happened in Mecca through reliable sources. According to Muhammad Hamidullah:
There is a very old tradition in Malabar, South-West Coast of India, that Chakrawati Farmas, one of their kings, had observed the splitting of the moon, the celebrated miracle of the Holy Prophet at Mecca, and learning on inquiry that there was a prediction of the coming of a Messenger of God from Arabia (Detail given below), he appointed his son as regent and set out to meet him. He embraced Islam at the hand of the Prophet, and when returning home, at the direction of the Prophet, died at the port of Zafar, Yemen, where the tomb of the "Indian king" was piously visited for many centuries.
Debate over the inviolability of heavenly bodies
The Qur'anic verse 54:1-2 was part of the debate between medieval Muslim theologians and Muslims philosophers over the issue of the inviolability of heavenly bodies. The philosophers held that the nature was composed of four fundamental elements: earth, air, fire, and water. Philosophers however held that the composition of heavenly bodies were different. This belief was based on the observation that the motion of heavenly bodies, unlike that of terrestrial bodies, was circular and without any beginnings or ends. This appearance of eternity in the heavenly bodies, led the philosophers to conclude that the heavens were inviolable. Theologians on the other hand proposed their own conception of the terrestrial matter: the nature was composed of uniform atoms that were re-created at every instant by God (the latter idea was added to defend God's omnipotence against the encroachment of the independent secondary causes). According to this conception, the heavenly bodies were essentially the same as the terrestrial bodies, and thus could be piercened
Note: The above had to be thought and teached well over a thousand years later from the time Islamic Religion took hold over the Arabic Tribes ridding themselves of Christianity by stopping the endless converting bringing back full control to the Arab Tribal Chiefs. How could anyone even contemplate things were made up of atoms? Yet alone express them in their theology at the time. No way did anyone anywhere in the world realized that atoms existed. Their were no Mathematical Einsteins,nor electronic Microscopes. Heavenly bodies were thought to raise over the flat land in the East and go down over the flat land in the West. They knew the Wheel so they drew the 12 signs of the zodiac to know the seasons and it was easier to draw that as a circle like the aforementined wheel . Circles always held mystery to them because they contained no beginning or no end. And their prinitive superstitious minds loved mysteries.
( again and again intelectual lies. They are trying to impose on the uneducated that these 6th Century men had knowledge that never entered mind until roughly the Eighteenth Century AD or CE whichever you prefer.)
In order to deal with implication of the traditional understanding of the Qur'anic verse 54:1-2, philosophers argued that the verse should be interpreted metaphorically (e.g. the verse could have referred to a partial lunar eclipse in which then earth obscured part of the moon).
They also had no conception of this. These explanations are all added a thousand plus years after the original mindset educationally wise of the happening! This is done by Intellectual lying leaders of the Faith to keep them in control of the ignorant by faith only members who want to please this revealed god by fear of him!!!!
This tradition has inspired many Muslim poets, especially in India. In poetical language Muhammad is sometimes equated with the sun or the morning light. As such, part of a poem from Sana'i, a renowned early twelfth century Persian Sufi poet, reads: "the sun should split the moon in two". Jalal ad-Din Rumi, a renowned Persian-writing poet and mystic, in one of his poems conveys the idea that to be split by the Muhammad's finger is the greatest bliss the lowly moon can hope for and a devoted believers splits the moon with Muhammad's finger. Elaborating on this idea, Abd ar-Rahman Jami, one of the classical poets and mystics of Persia, plays with the shapes and numerical values of Arabic letters in a complicated way: The full moon, Jami says, resembles the Arabic letter for a circular m with the numerical value 40. When Muhammad split the moon, it became like two crescent-shaped n's (the Arabic letter for "n") whose numerical value is 50 each. This would mean that, thanks for the miracle, the value of moon had increased.
In another place Rumi, according to Schimmel, alludes to two miracles attributed to Muhammad in tradition, i.e. the splitting of the moon (which shows the futility of man's scientific approach to nature), and the other that Muhammad being an illiterate:
The astronomer who believes in this miracle ( اي منجم اگرت شق قمر باور شد )
should laugh at his own profession as well as at sun and moon ( بايدت بر خود و بر شمس و قمر خنديدن ),
As everyone who has attended the school of Ahmad the ummi ( ور دمی مدرسه احمد امی ديدی )
may ridicule knowledge and art ( رو حلالستت بر فضل و هنر خنديدن ).
- Islamic view of miracles
- Islamic view of Moses, for the miracle of splitting the Sea, retold in the Qur'an
- Muhammad before Medina
- ^ Splitting of moon, Sahih Bukhari, Book 39, Chapter 8
- ^ "Muhammad." Encyclopedia Britannica. 2007. Encyclopedia Britannica Online, p.13
- ^ a b c Ibn Kathir, Tafsir ibn Kathir, Sura Qamar, verse 54:1-2
- ^ "According to al-Tabari, all the expositors (ahl al-ta'wil) agree on essentially this same account for the occasion for the revelation of these verses." cf. Thomas E. Burman, Religious Polemic and the Intellectual History of the Mozarabs, C.1050-1200, p.150
- ^ Annemarie Schimmel, And Muhammad Is His Messenger: The Veneration of the Prophet in Islamic Piety, University of North Carolina Press, 1985, p.69–70
- ^ Robert G. Mourison, The Portrayal of Nature in a Medieval Qur’an Commentary, Studia Islamica, 2002
- ^ a b c d e Robert G. Mourison, The Portrayal of Nature in a Medieval Qur’an Commentary, Studia Islamica, 2002
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Annemarie Schimmel, And Muhammad Is His Messenger: The Veneration of the Prophet in Islamic Piety, University of North Carolina Press, 1985, p.69–70
- ^ a b c d Wensinck, A.J. "Muʿd̲j̲iza." Encyclopaedia of Islam. Edited by: P. Bearman , Th. Bianquis , C.E. Bosworth , E. van Donzel and W.P. Heinrichs. Brill, 2007.
- ^ a b Denis Gril, Miracles, Encyclopedia of the Qur'an, Brill, 2007.
- ^ a b Daniel Martin Varisco, Moon, Encyclopedia of the Qur'an, Brill, 2007.
- ^ See for example, Bukhari (5:28:208-211), Bukhari (4:56:830-832), Bukhari (6:60:345), Bukhari (6:60:349f.), Bukhari (6:60:387-391), Muslim (39:6721), Muslim (39:6724-6726), Muslim (39:6728-6730)
- ^ a b c Allameh Tabatabaei, Tafsir al-Mizan, Verse 54:1-2
- ^ Sahih Muslim, The Book Giving Description of the Day of Judgement, Paradise and Hell, Book 039, Number 6725
- ^ Yusuf Ali, Meaning of The Noble Qur’an, Sura 54, v.1
- ^ Majma Ul-Bayan
- ^ M. A. S. Abdel Haleem: The Qur'an, a new translation, note to 54:1
- ^ a b Marshall Hodgson, The Venture of Islam: Conscience and History in a World Civilization, University of Chicago Press, p.451
- ^ Dr. Z. HAQ, CHAKRAWATI FARMAS King of Malabar India, India Office Library, London, Ref. No. Arabic, 2807, 152-173
- ^ M. Hamidullah, Muhammad Rasulullah: A concise survey of the life and work of the founder of Islam, 1979